New signups are temporarily closed.Existing customers can still sign in. Contact us to be notified when we reopen.
Skip to main content
NIST AI RMF · Subcategory 4.2

Organizational teams document the risks and potential impacts of the AI technology they design, develop, deploy, evaluate and use, and communicate about the impacts more broadly.

Summary

Organizational teams document the risks and potential impacts of the AI technology they design, develop, deploy, evaluate and use, and communicate about the impacts more broadly.

governanceimpact assessmentrisk culture

Read the full official text: https://airc.nist.gov/airmf-resources/playbook/

← Subcategory 4.1

Measurement approaches for identifying AI risks are connected to deployment context(s) and informed through consultation with domain experts and other end users. Approaches are documented.

Subcategory 4.2 →

Measurable activities for continual improvements are integrated into AI system updates and include regular engagement with interested parties, including relevant AI actors.

Track NIST AI RMF subcategory 4.2 as evidence

eurocompliant maps this obligation to a checklist task and the evidence that satisfies it, alongside every other framework you follow.

Start free trial

More from NIST AI RMF

Subcategory 1.1

Legal and regulatory requirements involving AI are understood, managed, and documented.

Subcategory 1.1

A determination is made as to whether the AI system achieves its intended purpose and stated objectives and whether its development or deployment should proceed.

Subcategory 1.1

Intended purpose, potentially beneficial uses, context-specific laws, norms and expectations, and prospective settings in which the AI system will be deployed are understood and documented. Considerations include: specific set or types of users along with their expectations; potential positive and negative impacts of system uses to individuals, communities, organizations, society, and the planet; assumptions and related limitations about AI system purposes; uses and risks across the development or product AI lifecycle; TEVV and system metrics.

Subcategory 1.1

Approaches and metrics for measurement of AI risks enumerated during the Map function are selected for implementation starting with the most significant AI risks. The risks or trustworthiness characteristics that will not – or cannot – be measured are properly documented.